President Trump is the people’s REPRESENTATIVE, not their SAVIOR

President Trump is the people’s REPRESENTATIVE, not their SAVIOR

President Trump was elected in a landslide victory of Electoral College votes and popular votes and victories in all seven swing states because President Trump’s Agenda 47 represents the type of society that a majority of US citizens want to live in, and that type of society is a Constitutional Federal Republic which protects Personal Liberty, Personal Rights, Personal Prosperity, and Personal Happiness. President Trump’s Executive Orders and Cabinet Appointments prove that he is keeping the promises that he made during his election campaign.

President Trump was elected because his goals and vision for America are preferable to a majority of the citizens of the USA than the goals and vision for the destruction of America that the Democratic Party waged over the previous four years.

President Trump’s election was a victory for Nationalism over Globalism, but a new adversary has arisen that seeks to abolish all forms of government: Anarchism.

Is there a new Anti-Government Anarchism movement taking over the alternative news media?

It seems like this Anarchism movement only criticizes all forms of government, government institutions, and government participants.

They never advocate and champion the greatest form of government ever conceived, the U.S. Constitutional Federal Republic.

From Whitney Webb post on X on 11/24/24:

“It's not blackpilled or means i'm on someone's payroll to say that i don't trust the national political class in the US to make Americans lives better or protect them during a crisis.

I trust regular Americans to come together during a crisis to help each other out, which invariably happens. I trust regular people to build parallel systems in their communities when shtf.

The government just executes wealth transfers and wants you dependent, desperate and surveilled bc it benefits the oligarch class they serve. Regular Americans don't do this and I'm very hopeful many will figure it out and weather the storm successfully. Self reliance and community matter more than the political circus and the sooner people figure that out, the better.“

Have you heard of the new Independent Media Alliance (IMA)?

From: Iain Davis, IMA member

https://iaindavis.com/the-independent-media-alliance-first-panel-discussion/

The IMA was the idea of Whitney Webb (Unlimited Hangout), Ryan Cristián (The Last American Vagabond) and Derrick Broze (The Conscious Resistance Network). The IMA is a collaborative effort focused on promoting objective, fact-based media from a diverse team of journalists, podcasters, and writers.

The current roster includes:

Hakeem Anwar, Above Phone / Take Back Our Tech

Catherine Austin-Fitts, Solari Report

Jason Bassler, The Free Thought Project

Jason Bermas, The Jason Bermas Show

Catte Black, Off-Guardian

James Corbett, The Corbett Report

Richard Grove, Grand Theft World Podcast

Kit Knightly, Off-Guardian

Hrvoje Morić, Geopolitics and Empire

Steve Poikonen, Slow News Day / AM Wake Up

Charlie Robinson, Macroaggressions Podcast

Carey Wedler

Also from Iain Davis:

The Parasite Class

https://iaindavis.com/the-parasite-class/

Whitney Webb’s “Unlimited Hangout” website is now, in my opinion, the “Unhinged Hysteria” website, and by that I mean intentionally writing hit pieces with the motive of trying to deceptively manipulate a reader into believing what the author wants the reader to believe, because the writer has a political agenda of their own, and the hit piece is designed to confuse the reader into thinking that the writer’s agenda is preferable to the agenda of the hit piece target.

To clarify, “Unhinged Hysteria” used to write hit pieces on the Globalists, but now they are writing hit pieces on the Nationalists because “Unhinged Hysteria” want their readers to adopt a society that is based upon the total anti-government Anarchism of Spoonerism and the anti-technological innovation of Neo-Luddism.

I wonder if “Unhinged Hysteria” realizes that the type of social order that they seek actually aligns perfectly with the type of social order that the British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy seek, and maybe that is why the British authorities have not censored or incarcerated UK Spoonerist authors like Iain Davis???

The British Imperialist Fascist Oligarchy seek a return to Feudalism with a One World Global Empire where there are open borders and no independent sovereign nation-states, where the people cluster in small agrarian villages, and where there is no industrialization fueled by technological innovation, which aligns perfectly with the type of society sought by the writers of “Unhinged Hysteria.”

Spoonerism:

Spooner was an anti-capitalist individualist.[20] This association is wrapped in the definition of capitalism, whether viewed as a system of managerial domination and exploitation, or a simpler definition of free market with private property, since Spooner supported the latter.[20] According to Peter Marshall, "the egalitarian implications of traditional individualist anarchists" such as Spooner and Benjamin Tucker have been overlooked.[21]

As an individualist anarchist, Spooner advocated for pre-industrial living in communities of small property holders so that they could pursue life, liberty, happiness and property in mutual honesty without ceding responsibility to a central government.[1] In addition to his extra-governmental post service and views on abolitionism, Spooner wrote No Treason in which he contends that the Constitution is based on voluntary consent and that citizens are not bound by involuntary allegiance.[22] Spooner argued that the national Congress should dissolve and let citizens rule themselves as he held that individuals should make their own fates.[23]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysander_Spooner

Neo-Luddism:

Neo-Luddism or new Luddism is a philosophy opposing many forms of modern technology.[1] The term Luddite is generally used as a pejorative applied to people showing technophobic leanings.[2] The name is based on the historical legacy of the English Luddites, who were active between 1811 and 1817.[1] While the original Luddites were mostly concerned with the economic implications of improving technology in regard to industrialization, neo-Luddites tend to have a broader and more holistic distrust of technological improvement.

Neo-Luddism is a leaderless movement of non-affiliated groups who resist modern technologies and dictate a return of some or all technologies to a more primitive level.[3] Neo-Luddites are characterized by one or more of the following practices: passively abandoning the use of technology, harming those who produce technology harmful to the environment, advocating simple living, or sabotaging technology. The modern neo-Luddite movement has connections with the anti-globalization movement, anarcho-primitivism, radical environmentalism, and deep ecology.[3]

Neo-Luddism is based on the concern of the technological impact on individuals, their communities, and/or the environment.[4] Neo-Luddism stipulates the use of the precautionary principle for all new technologies, insisting that technologies be proven safe before adoption, due to the unknown effects that new technologies might inspire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Luddism

So as the hit pieces pour out of the alternative media against President Trump, his policies, and his Administration, keep in mind the ulterior motive for those hit pieces and whether or not they reflect the author’s “unhinged hysteria” over what they want you to believe, versus what President Trump and his Administration are actually achieving to safeguard U.S. citizen’s Constitutional Personal Liberty, Personal Rights, Personal Prosperity, and Personal Happiness.